victorismyhero
Well-known member
Oh dear....I only asked :fie: think I'l shut up and keep quiet.
No I wont...........I'll stick my oar in
Nic...I havnt been "brought up in shooting correctly" and I have to admit I take umbridge at the implied snobbery in that statement as I HAVE been "brought up to respect the countyside"....Last time i did any "serious" shooting was in the 60's when my mate of 14 had a licence and could supervise me (also 14) with his "spare" gun ( a beautiful old lee enfield .303 bored out to .410 and chambered for 3" magnums...bolt fed too...8 rounds in the mag and one "up the spout" :spiteful: ) and this will be my first SGC (when it arrives) HOWEVER....I would NEVER use plaswads whilst shooting over agricultural land or indeed ANY land where animals may graze...even wood land with deer....to me leaving the place littered with plaswads is the same mentality as throwing your empty coke bottles down any old where or chucking your sarnie wrappers about....OK fiber are a smidge dearer and "may" not perform as well in modern back bored guns (dunno....<<<shrugs>>>> but at least they are degradeable. dunno yet about clay grounds....I suppose if they allow plaswads then they know what they are doing????? and presumably dont mind a few 1000 plaswads amongst the piles of black and fluorescent orange clay fragments.
I suppose that, unless one is after the 10 mile high bird, the pellet hardness is a matter of some conjecture....I dare say that the pigeon or even pheassy at 25-40 yards doesnt really know the difference between 3% and 7 % antimony. Just how much armour DOES feathering provide and how does this vary amongst species I wonder? and EXACTLY how much harder is one pellet composition as compared to another...If pellet hardness were a critical factor, presumably steel would be considered superior , which of course, as we all know is not the case, because DENSITY is more important.
I suppose that...given that ANY cartridge is going to outperform ME, at least for a while...I'll buy a reasonably priced game shell for live shooting and the cheapest I can find to sling at clays whilst I "get my eye in", on the principle that, at least to start with, I'll be killing (or at least trying to kill) a LOT more clays than furry/feathery things.
No I wont...........I'll stick my oar in
Nic...I havnt been "brought up in shooting correctly" and I have to admit I take umbridge at the implied snobbery in that statement as I HAVE been "brought up to respect the countyside"....Last time i did any "serious" shooting was in the 60's when my mate of 14 had a licence and could supervise me (also 14) with his "spare" gun ( a beautiful old lee enfield .303 bored out to .410 and chambered for 3" magnums...bolt fed too...8 rounds in the mag and one "up the spout" :spiteful: ) and this will be my first SGC (when it arrives) HOWEVER....I would NEVER use plaswads whilst shooting over agricultural land or indeed ANY land where animals may graze...even wood land with deer....to me leaving the place littered with plaswads is the same mentality as throwing your empty coke bottles down any old where or chucking your sarnie wrappers about....OK fiber are a smidge dearer and "may" not perform as well in modern back bored guns (dunno....<<<shrugs>>>> but at least they are degradeable. dunno yet about clay grounds....I suppose if they allow plaswads then they know what they are doing????? and presumably dont mind a few 1000 plaswads amongst the piles of black and fluorescent orange clay fragments.
I suppose that, unless one is after the 10 mile high bird, the pellet hardness is a matter of some conjecture....I dare say that the pigeon or even pheassy at 25-40 yards doesnt really know the difference between 3% and 7 % antimony. Just how much armour DOES feathering provide and how does this vary amongst species I wonder? and EXACTLY how much harder is one pellet composition as compared to another...If pellet hardness were a critical factor, presumably steel would be considered superior , which of course, as we all know is not the case, because DENSITY is more important.
I suppose that...given that ANY cartridge is going to outperform ME, at least for a while...I'll buy a reasonably priced game shell for live shooting and the cheapest I can find to sling at clays whilst I "get my eye in", on the principle that, at least to start with, I'll be killing (or at least trying to kill) a LOT more clays than furry/feathery things.
Last edited by a moderator: