Hi folks: Im a retired lightly built male, height 5'6, weighing 11stone and are getting back into shooting after a thirty year break !
I am attracted to 20g for sporting clays due to light gun weight and fast handling. As most folk at our sporting shoot use 12g 24gram loads it occurs to me that the argument for using a 12g to better absorb recoil is maybe not as valid as it was when 32gram was the norm. I can comfortably shoot 100 rounds of 24gram with a 20g without fatigue or recoil awareness.
I still get the comments " give yourself more of a chance to break clays use a 12g" but don't understand this as 24grams is 24 grams regardless of what gun one uses ?
So is there a valid reason to move from 20g to 12g for shooting sporting clays..........I understand the need for a heavy gun for trap and skeet but thats not what Im interested in.
One alternative is a Beretta ultralight 12g which weighs in at 6.25ilbs similar to a 20g but opens up the possibility of cheaper 12g shells.
Your thoughts appreciated.
I am attracted to 20g for sporting clays due to light gun weight and fast handling. As most folk at our sporting shoot use 12g 24gram loads it occurs to me that the argument for using a 12g to better absorb recoil is maybe not as valid as it was when 32gram was the norm. I can comfortably shoot 100 rounds of 24gram with a 20g without fatigue or recoil awareness.
I still get the comments " give yourself more of a chance to break clays use a 12g" but don't understand this as 24grams is 24 grams regardless of what gun one uses ?
So is there a valid reason to move from 20g to 12g for shooting sporting clays..........I understand the need for a heavy gun for trap and skeet but thats not what Im interested in.
One alternative is a Beretta ultralight 12g which weighs in at 6.25ilbs similar to a 20g but opens up the possibility of cheaper 12g shells.
Your thoughts appreciated.