Welcome to ShootClay Forum
|
Join us at ShootClay - and enjoy blogs, galleries, our events calendar and our legendary forums - you can chat to top shots, and learn from the experts. All it takes to join is an email address, we'll keep it safe, never share it and we won't send you any spam. Listings in our calendar for shooting grounds are 100% free - just join up and contact the admins - we'll get you sorted out. What are you waiting for? Jump in! Any questions - please contact admin@shootclayforum.com |
|
| Guest Message by DevFuse | |
Essex Masters
#41
Posted 15 April 2012 - 05:08 PM
#42
Posted 15 April 2012 - 06:11 PM
#43
Posted 15 April 2012 - 07:34 PM
#45
Posted 16 April 2012 - 10:25 AM
#46
Posted 18 April 2012 - 11:06 AM
#47
Posted 18 April 2012 - 02:51 PM
#48
Posted 18 April 2012 - 03:49 PM
So just asking those who shot it, what didn't you like specifically?
#49
Posted 18 April 2012 - 05:12 PM
I still haven't seen anyone actually put their finger on what it was they didn't enjoy?! A few complained there were not enough long range birds, possibly, or that there wasn't enough variety; I can't personally think of a single stand that was the same as any other. The organisation was pretty faultless on the day I shot and the winning / overall scores seemed to suggest it was plenty hard enough. Shockingly the Ladies category was won by what I consider a low score given what we have come to expect form this outstanding shooter.
So just asking those who shot it, what didn't you like specifically?
They just bitch because they got a crap score, always the same. If they score well, it's the best shoot ever. If they cock it up, it's a rubbish shoot.
You get bored reading it.
We went on the Friday, nothing wrong with the organisation at all.
#50
Posted 18 April 2012 - 06:41 PM
HammyI still haven't seen anyone actually put their finger on what it was they didn't enjoy?! A few complained there were not enough long range birds, possibly, or that there wasn't enough variety; I can't personally think of a single stand that was the same as any other. The organisation was pretty faultless on the day I shot and the winning / overall scores seemed to suggest it was plenty hard enough. Shockingly the Ladies category was won by what I consider a low score given what we have come to expect form this outstanding shooter.
So just asking those who shot it, what didn't you like specifically?
I thought last years essex was the best ever (not because i won anything which i did not} but just great targets.this year it was not as good.when i miss a clay 90% of the time i am behind so a bit more lead and i am on it.but this year i missed in front on a lot of stands.i felt tricked rather than beaten. but its very clever target setting i suppose.
chippy
#51
Posted 18 April 2012 - 06:47 PM
#52
Posted 18 April 2012 - 08:12 PM
#53
Posted 18 April 2012 - 09:19 PM
#54
Posted 18 April 2012 - 10:12 PM
They just bitch because they got a crap score, always the same. If they score well, it's the best shoot ever. If they cock it up, it's a rubbish shoot. You get bored reading it. We went on the Friday, nothing wrong with the organisation at all.
What a wonderfully simple view of the world..............
I don't know anything about Friday, because I wasn't there, so am not qualified to comment. I was there on Sunday however. In my opinion, there were too many squads, containing too many people (8 - 9) resulting in a long day, with too much hanging around on the stands and little if no break between the layouts.
As for the targets, I (personally) didn't enjoy the surfeit of white targets, which turned some of the presentations into an eye sight test as opposed to a test of shooting skill and I would have liked to have seen some more 'X' factor targets. Something that's not easy to quantify and arguably different for all, however big crossers that require a bus length of lead put a smile on my chops when I hit them! (OK, I've not got a lot in my life and I'm easily pleased!!
I of course respect everyone's right to disagree with me.........
#55
Posted 19 April 2012 - 09:11 AM
What a wonderfully simple view of the world..............
Scuta,
Totally agree with u on that one, I have shot the Essex for last few years and this one wasnt my cup of tea ., all this slow dropping stuff has got its place but not on most stands, personaly the last stand on the red course was the only stand needing a gap, this shoot straight at stuff is not what shotguns are designed for, after travelling for 4hrs u expect to be entertained not demoralised with missing birds crashing to the ground at 10yrds or floppy birds where the 32" gun has no place . ???????? Roll on Westfields
#56
Posted 19 April 2012 - 09:30 AM
It is very hard to do both. Do most of the top shooters care what is thrown and do they enjoy it when they are trying to make a winning score? probably not IMO.
Only after do they reflect and think of the target presentation and enjoy the winning if they have performed. At the time they are competing it is a target that has to be broken and the moment they stop to think ooooh these targets are not interesting etcetc is the moment they are losing their optimum performance.
At the end of the day if you want to be at the top and shoot good scores you really have to not give a monkies of what the quality of target presentation is.
If you are there just to have a laugh and a day out then obviously your needs will be different.
In regards to ques I have had to learn to except it, especially whilst shooting over here as it is very relaxed and there is no rushing around at all.
Back in the UK everything needs to be done and dusted in an hour or so, so that those without enough brownie points from the wife can get home for Sunday dinner in time!. Only a few can hack the waiting game.
Glen.
#57
Posted 19 April 2012 - 09:35 AM
#58
Posted 19 April 2012 - 09:39 AM
#59
Posted 19 April 2012 - 09:39 AM
What a wonderfully simple view of the world..............
Scuta,
Totally agree with u on that one, I have shot the Essex for last few years and this one wasnt my cup of tea ., all this slow dropping stuff has got its place but not on most stands, personaly the last stand on the red course was the only stand needing a gap, this shoot straight at stuff is not what shotguns are designed for, after travelling for 4hrs u expect to be entertained not demoralised with missing birds crashing to the ground at 10yrds or floppy birds where the 32" gun has no place . ???????? Roll on Westfields
missed this one ? so can't comment .but tend to feel a little let down at bigger shoots these days, but if you have ever put on a shoot you will soon realise 70% of shooters have different ideas on what is good and bad .......no win situation
#60
Posted 19 April 2012 - 10:29 AM
I'd be disappointed if the Dutch were any other way TBH. Fancy a schmoke?





Sign In




