If you want to grade the difficulty of a shoot just use an average taken from A class. High gun is normally super human so not really relevant and C class can throw up some random stuff but A normally shows a true reflection.
Ok make it 4 5 6 in a period or twice in a month or anything that helps give steady shooters an incentive to go comp. But using scores based on what people were doing 12 or 18 months ago is plain daft.
Really ? I said a score 2 classes above your own so if an A class shooter puts in 3 90 somethings they go into AA I think that's fair enough considering there are people in A hitting 76 every week. They can come down again at the end of the period whether it be 3 or 6 monthly.
If you are...
It just needs to move faster having C class regularly won with A/AA class scores does not give the masses an incentive to go competition. It's not anybody sandbagging either its just people improving quickly in a system that moves at a snails pace.
My mate and I haven't shot at all for 6 months and if I've understood the scores correctly we have both moved up a class, he's gone from A to AA!!! Not that either of us are bothered but what a farcical system basing your current classification on what you were doing a year ago.
Would you say the patch on the right shoulder would qualify as a fitasc line? I've never shot fitasc but for 16 quid I might buy one in case I ever do. It would save having a bit of tape stuck to your gun like someone on here did.