I really hate driven but my best high fast driven where there is no possible way of taking it as a crosser, chanting the barrels etc is usually when I let my barrels go so to speak and my cheek barely touches the stock. If it were driven low I would naturally be on the stock and try to cut it off. I'm still trying to find ways for different types of driven, the fight continues.
this is really my point.
Depends where everyone else is. What looks to you like a perfect crosser might be the perfect driven to a gun further down the line (if the line curves a bit).
In that case, any gun set-up for driven birds would be a compromise for crossing / quartering targets. The decision would then be based on whether it is more of an issue trying to take driven targets with a standard set-up than taking crosser / quartering birds with a gun tailored for driven birds.
Would the " master race from Brittania" be the krauts that took over your monarchy? And if you could elucidate the content of that education I'd be most appreciative. Seems as tho in the international scene the colonials are doin' pretty OK but I admit that my interest there is marginal and I might well be misinformed. :console:Wonko,
I think the majority of people would not have a clue about stock configuration.
History shows that Americans never had a clue until educated by the master race from Brittania
Perhaps more should read and enjoy * Gordon Carlisle's book * , and for the younger generation who do not have the attention span to read a book , just watch Richard Fauld's style.
* Shotgun Marksmanship by Percy Stanbury & Gordon Carlisle *
Wonko ,
" have a nice day , hold the rail , mind the step, this is not fake news. " :wub: :wub: :angel:
yes ideally but in reality !!!!
exactly ?
I have stanbury and Churchill books. Fundamentally the only difference really is that Churchill method relies on "feel" for the shot with no conscious thought given to lead. That and obviously stance is different. I seem to use stanbury stance but Churchill mentality.
pmsl. ?
